Drone identifying human trafficking vehicles
Contributed by:
sachiniw
Characteristics:
Trust Type: Combination; Interaction: Observation; Stage: Future/Perceived; Risk: Task Failure; System: Robotic-AV; Test Environment: ITL-Audio-Visual; ITL-Online; Measurement: Self-Reported; Application Domain: UC needs special equipment; Pattern: None;
Description
Participants watch a video of a hypothetical drone system capable of identifying, tracking and neutralizing human trafficking vehicles, assuming the role of a drone operator. The video contained narrations of 4 different information types: (1) control - describes what the system was used for, (2) performance only - consistency and reliability of system behavior (3) process only - qualities of the system behavior such as its algorithms and (4) both performance and process. After watching the video participants answer questionnaires to evaluate the system's ability, integrity and benevolence.
Commentary
Participants with experience in operating drones were excluded, hypothetical scenario presented on video, participants assume the role of a drone operator
Original purpose
To examine trust in automation from a multidimensional perspective: ability, integrity, and benevolence perceptions.
RRI issues
Accountability, if the drone makes a wrong identification.
Source
T. Jensen, Y. Albayram, M. M. H. Khan, R. Buck, E. Coman, M. A. A. Fahim, Initial trustworthiness perceptions of a drone system based on performance and process information, in: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, 2018, pp. 229–237.